Legal Resource Navigator

ORS 161.305 — Qualifying mental disorder as affirmative defense

Oregon criminal law — ORS Title 16 (2025 snapshot) · legal_authorities

ORS 161.305 — Qualifying mental disorder as affirmative defense

161.305 Qualifying mental disorder as affirmative defense. Qualifying mental disorder constituting insanity under ORS 161.295 is an affirmative defense. [1971 c.743 §38; 1983 c.800 §2; 2017 c.634 §5]

Source: Oregon Legislature — ORS 2025 Edition, Chapter 161 · ORS 161.305

Stored review status: 2025_edition_later_amendments_unresolved. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Official chapter context and edition notices
TITLE 16 CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS Chapter 161. General Provisions 162. Offenses Against the State and Public Justice 163. Offenses Against Persons 163A. Sex Offender Reporting and Classification 164. Offenses Against Property 165. Offenses Involving Fraud or Deception 166. Offenses Against Public Order; Firearms and Other Weapons; Racketeering 167. Offenses Against General Welfare and Animals 169. Local and Regional Correctional Facilities; Prisoners; Juvenile Facilities _______________ Chapter 161 — General Provisions Uncodified sections printed in this chapter were amended or repealed by the Legislative Assembly during its 2026 regular session. See the table of uncodified sections amended or repealed during the 2026 regular session: 2026 A&R Tables 2025 EDITION GENERAL PROVISIONS CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS PRINCIPLES CRIMINAL LIABILITY PARTIES TO CRIME JUSTIFICATION RESPONSIBILITY (Temporary provisions relating to maximum periods of commitment and community restoration are compiled as notes following ORS 161.371) INCHOATE CRIMES CLASSES OF OFFENSES DISPOSITION OF OFFENDERS AUTHORITY OF SENTENCING COURT PRINCIPLES
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original chapter HTML file

File SHA-256: 8773685681f1bf26a63d62a05c338a6e76c17f6dd1b69da0a77625951fdf2fe5. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. This page displays the selected Oregon section record with its printed versions and adjoining notes. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: official snapshot extraction not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: oregon_criminal_law:legal_authorities:161.305
Source file: ors161.html
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 8c53002b4a8087d0f82a88d49a01203ac828cd4435393ff61e76da4fcfcf815f
Retained source evidence SHA-256: 8773685681f1bf26a63d62a05c338a6e76c17f6dd1b69da0a77625951fdf2fe5

Source location: ORS 161.305 (all printed versions and notes)

Stored source content

161.305 Qualifying mental disorder as affirmative defense. Qualifying mental disorder constituting insanity under ORS 161.295 is an affirmative defense. [1971 c.743 §38; 1983 c.800 §2; 2017 c.634 §5]

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Oregon criminal law — ORS Title 16 (2025 snapshot) · legal_authorities

ORS 161.295 — Guilty except for insanity

161.295 Guilty except for insanity. (1) A person is guilty except for insanity if, at the time of engaging in criminal conduct, the person lacks substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality of the conduct or to conform the conduct to the requirements of law, and: (a) But for a qualifying mental disorder, the person would have had such substantial capacity; (b) A mental disorder other than a qualifying mental disorder is not the primary cause of the lack of substantial capacity; and (c) The lack of substantial capacity is not the result of voluntary intoxication in combination with a qualifying mental disorder, a mental disorder other than a qualifying mental disorder or both. (2) As used in chapter 743, Oregon Laws 1971, the term “qualifying mental disorder” does not include an abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct, nor does the term include any abnormality constituting solely a personality disorder. [1971 c.743 §36; 1983 c.800 §1; 2017 c.634 §3; 2025 c.119 §1] Note: See note under 161.015.

Source: Oregon Legislature — ORS 2025 Edition, Chapter 161 · ORS 161.295

Stored review status: 2025_edition_later_amendments_unresolved. Explicit ORS citation in the printed section; applicability is unreviewed.