**(a) In general** The Secretary shall make grants, in accordance with this section, to the highest State courts in States participating in the program under part E of this subchapter, for the purpose of enabling such courts—
(1) to conduct assessments, in accordance with such requirements as the Secretary shall publish, of the role, responsibilities, and effectiveness of State courts in carrying out State laws requiring proceedings (conducted by or under the supervision of the courts)—
(A) that implement this part and part E of this subchapter;
(B) that determine the advisability or appropriateness of foster care placement;
(C) that determine whether to terminate parental rights;
(D) that determine whether to approve the adoption or other permanent placement of a child; 11 So in original. Probably should be followed by “and”.
(E) that determine the best strategy to use to expedite the interstate placement of children, including—
(i) requiring courts in different States to cooperate in the sharing of information;
(ii) authorizing courts to obtain information and testimony from agencies and parties in other States without requiring interstate travel by the agencies and parties; and
(iii) permitting the participation of parents, children, other necessary parties, and attorneys in cases involving interstate placement without requiring their interstate travel; and 22 So in original. The word “and” probably should not appear.
(F) that determine the appropriateness and best practices for use of technology to conduct remote hearings, subject to participant consent, including to ensure maximum participation of individuals involved in proceedings and to enable courts to maintain operations in times of public health or other emergencies;
(2) to
File SHA-256: 14087fbfa3e8b7b11717f51d434c4fcea56a0579596a27f5b37a9c8fd6837a7a. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. This page displays the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_c41ffc10d80ef045351cf889 Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-42/section-629h-entitlement-funding-for-state-courts-to-assess-and-improve-handling-of-p--6ba51fa1bb.md Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded Passage SHA-256: 9c2568a07d3e7b4fca8101c1f8019c1f64ce8a7a7f464fe0019006e0a1013baa Retained source evidence SHA-256: 14087fbfa3e8b7b11717f51d434c4fcea56a0579596a27f5b37a9c8fd6837a7a
Source location: Title 42, Chapter 7, § 629h; chapter-007-social-security.md
Stored source content
**(a) In general** The Secretary shall make grants, in accordance with this section, to the highest State courts in States participating in the program under part E of this subchapter, for the purpose of enabling such courts—
(1) to conduct assessments, in accordance with such requirements as the Secretary shall publish, of the role, responsibilities, and effectiveness of State courts in carrying out State laws requiring proceedings (conducted by or under the supervision of the courts)—
(A) that implement this part and part E of this subchapter;
(B) that determine the advisability or appropriateness of foster care placement;
(C) that determine whether to terminate parental rights;
(D) that determine whether to approve the adoption or other permanent placement of a child; 11 So in original. Probably should be followed by “and”.
(E) that determine the best strategy to use to expedite the interstate placement of children, including—
(i) requiring courts in different States to cooperate in the sharing of information;
(ii) authorizing courts to obtain information and testimony from agencies and parties in other States without requiring interstate travel by the agencies and parties; and
(iii) permitting the participation of parents, children, other necessary parties, and attorneys in cases involving interstate placement without requiring their interstate travel; and 22 So in original. The word “and” probably should not appear.
(F) that determine the appropriateness and best practices for use of technology to conduct remote hearings, subject to participant consent, including to ensure maximum participation of individuals involved in proceedings and to enable courts to maintain operations in times of public health or other emergencies;
(2) to implement improvements the highest state 33 So in original. Probably should be capitalized. courts deem necessary as a result of the assessments, including—
(A) to provide for the safety, well-being, and permanence of children in foster care in a timely and complete manner, as set forth in the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–89), including the requirements in the Act related to concurrent planning;
(B) to implement a corrective action plan, as necessary, resulting from reviews of child and family service programs under [section 1320a–2a of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section1320a-2a&num=0&edition=prelim); and
(C) to increase and improve engagement of the entire family in court processes relating to child welfare, family preservation, family reunification, and adoption, including by training judges, attorneys, and other legal personnel and supporting optimal use of remote hearing technology; and
(3) to ensure continuity of needed court services, prevent disruption of the services, and enable their recovery from threats such as public health crises, natural disasters or cyberattacks, including through—
(A) support for technology that allows court proceedings to occur remotely subject to participant consent, including hearings and legal representation;
(B) the development of guidance and protocols for responding to the occurrences and coordinating with other agencies; and
(C) other activities carried out to ensure backup systems are in place.
**(b) Applications** In order to be eligible to receive a grant under this section, a highest State court shall have in effect a rule requiring State courts to ensure that foster parents, pre-adoptive parents, and relative caregivers of a child in foster care under the responsibility of the State are notified of any proceeding to be held with respect to the child, shall provide for the training of judges, attorneys, and other legal personnel in child welfare cases on Federal child welfare policies and payment limitations with respect to children in foster care who are placed in settings that are not a foster family home, and shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such form, and including such information and assurances as the Secretary may require, including—
(1) a description of how courts and child welfare agencies on the local and State levels will use not less than 30 percent of grant funds to collaborate and jointly plan for the collection and sharing of all relevant data and information to demonstrate how improved case tracking and analysis of child abuse and neglect cases will produce safe and timely permanency decisions;
(2) a demonstration that a portion of the grant will be used for cross-training initiatives that are jointly planned and executed with the State agency or any other agency under contract with the State to administer the State program under the State plan under subpart 1, the State plan approved under [section 629d of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section629d&num=0&edition=prelim), or the State plan approved under part E; and
(3) a demonstration of meaningful and ongoing collaboration among the courts in the State, the State agency or any other agency under contract with the State who is responsible for administering the State program under this part or part E, and, where applicable, Indian tribes.
**(c) Amount of grant**
(1) **In general** — From the amounts reserved under sections 629f(b)(1) and 629g(b)(2) of this title for a fiscal year, each highest State court that has an application approved under this section for the fiscal year shall be entitled to payment of an amount equal to the sum of—
(A) $255,000; and
(B) the amount described in paragraph (2) with respect to the court and the fiscal year.
(2) **Amount described** — The amount described in this paragraph with respect to a court and a fiscal year is the amount that bears the same ratio to the total of the amounts reserved under sections 629f(b)(1) and 629g(b)(2) of this title for grants under this section for the fiscal year (after applying paragraphs (1)(A) and (3) of this subsection) as the number of individuals in the State in which the court is located who have not attained 21 years of age bears to the total number of such individuals in all States with a highest State court that has an approved application under this section for the fiscal year.
(3) **Indian tribes** — From the amounts reserved under [section 629f(b)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section629f/b/1&num=0&edition=prelim) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall, before applying paragraph (1) of this subsection, allocate $1,000,000 for fiscal year 2025, and $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2029, for grants to be awarded on a competitive basis among the highest courts of Indian tribes or tribal consortia that—
(A) are operating a program under part E, in accordance with [section 679c of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section679c&num=0&edition=prelim);
(B) are seeking to operate a program under part E and have received an implementation grant under [section 676 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section676&num=0&edition=prelim); or
(C) have a court responsible for proceedings related to foster care or adoption.
**(d) Federal share** Each highest State court which receives funds paid under this section may use such funds to pay not more than 75 percent of the cost of activities under this section in each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029.
**(e) Guidance**
(1) **In general** — Every 5 years, the Secretary shall issue implementation guidance for sharing information on best practices for—
(A) technological changes needed for court proceedings for foster care, guardianship, or adoption to be conducted remotely in a way that maximizes engagement and protects the privacy of participants; and
(B) the manner in which the proceedings should be conducted.
(2) **Initial issuance** — The Secretary shall issue initial guidance required by paragraph (1) with preliminary information on best practices not later than October 1, 2025.
(3) **Additional consultation** — The Secretary shall consult with Indian tribes on the development of appropriate guidelines for State court proceedings involving Indian children to maximize engagement of Indian tribes and provide appropriate guidelines on conducting State court proceedings subject to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 ([25 U.S.C. 1901](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title25-section1901&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.).
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Sense of Congress** It is the sense of Congress that the absence of locally convenient day schools may contribute to the breakup of Indian families.
**(b) Report to Congress; contents, etc.** The Secretary is authorized and directed to prepare, in consultation with appropriate agencies in the Department of Health and Human Services, a report on the feasibility of providing Indian children with schools located near their homes, and to submit such report to the Select Committee on Indian Affairs of the United States Senate and the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the United States House of Representatives within two years from November 8, 1978. In developing this report the Secretary shall give particular consideration to the provision of educational facilities for children in the elementary grades.
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 25 U.S.C. § 1901. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
§ 1901. Congressional findings
Recognizing the special relationship between
the United States and the Indian tribes and
their members and the Federal responsibility to
Indian people, the Congress finds—
(1) that clause 3, section 8, article I of the
United States Constitution provides that ‘‘The
Congress shall have Power * * * To regulate
Commerce * * * with Indian tribes 1’’ and,
through this and other constitutional author-
ity, Congress has plenary power over Indian
affairs;
(2) that Congress, through statutes, treaties,
and the general course of dealing with Indian
tribes, has assumed the responsibility for the
protection and preservation of Indian tribes
and their resources;
(3) that there is no resource that is more
vital to the continued existence and integrity
of Indian tribes than their children and that
the United States has a direct interest, as
trustee, in protecting Indian children who are
members of or are eligible for membership in
an Indian tribe;
(4) that an alarmingly high percentage of In-
dian families are broken up by the removal,
often unwarranted, of their children from
them by nontribal public and private agencies
and that an alarmingly high percentage of
such children are placed in non-Indian foster
and adoptive homes and institutions; and
(5) that the States, exercising their recog-
nized jurisdiction over Indian child custody
proceedings through administrative and judi-
cial bodies, have often failed to recognize the
essential tribal relations of Indian people and
the cultural and social standards prevailing in
Indian communities and families.
(Pub. L. 95–608, § 2, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3069.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
SHORT TITLE
Pub. L. 95–608, § 1, Nov. 8, 1987, 92 Stat. 3069, provided:
‘
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 25 U.S.C. § 1901. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
§ 629h. Entitlement funding for State courts to
assess and improve handling of proceedings
relating to foster care and adoption
(a) In general
The Secretary shall make grants, in accord-
ance with this section, to the highest State
courts in States participating in the program
under part E of this subchapter, for the purpose
of enabling such courts—
(1) to conduct assessments, in accordance
with such requirements as the Secretary shall
publish, of the role, responsibilities, and effec-
tiveness of State courts in carrying out State
laws requiring proceedings (conducted by or
under the supervision of the courts)—
(A) that implement this part and part E of
this subchapter;
(B) that determine the advisability or ap-
propriateness of foster care placement;
(C) that determine whether to terminate
parental rights;
(D) that determine whether to approve the
adoption or other permanent placement of a
child; 1
(E) that determine the best strategy to use
to expedite the interstate placement of chil-
dren, including—
(i) requiring courts in different States to
cooperate in the sharing of information;
(ii) authorizing courts to obtain informa-
tion and testimony from agencies and par-
ties in other States without requiring
interstate travel by the agencies and par-
ties; and
(iii) permitting the participation of par-
ents, children, other necessary parties, and
attorneys in cases involving interstate
placement without requiring their inter-
state travel; and 2
(2) to implement improvements the highest
state 3 courts deem necessary as a result of the
assessments, including—
(A) to provide for the safety, well-being,
and permanence of children in foster care in
a timely and complete manner, as set forth
in the Adoption and Safe Families Act of
1997 (P